Sam Ravnborg @ Fri, May 02, 2008 at 08:08:13AM +0200: > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:48:58AM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote: > > Sam, please, tell to those guys, that shell must be `bash`, as Roman wanted. > > No - we want to be portable across as many setups as possible. > So forcing us to use bash is in the long run not a good solutions. > > We should go for the least common denominator - busy-box could be the one. ,-- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702082335150.14457@xxxxxxxxxx> -- |It would make casual kbuild hacking only even more difficult, as one has |to check it works with the various shells. `-- So, time goes on, and random busybox user can solve all kbuild problems with scripting. Alright. For the record, i still doing my own way: klibc + `[d]ash` + `minised` (|| GNU `sed` if something will be too stupid). ____ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
