On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 08:30:09PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:07:14PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
I put RFC back in because we haven't yet decided if this is the best
approach to support SVSM vTPM, but I really like to receive feedbacks
especially from the maintainer/reviewers of the TPM subsystem, to see if
this approach is acceptable.
I didn't look in high detail, but the overall shape is what I was
thinking about in our previous conversations. Very little TPM code is
under arch/, we have a nice simplifying helper in the core code, and
you have a tidy platform device to tie it all together.
Thank you so much for taking a look and confirming that I understood
your suggestions correctly!
Stefano
