On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:07:14PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > I put RFC back in because we haven't yet decided if this is the best > approach to support SVSM vTPM, but I really like to receive feedbacks > especially from the maintainer/reviewers of the TPM subsystem, to see if > this approach is acceptable. I didn't look in high detail, but the overall shape is what I was thinking about in our previous conversations. Very little TPM code is under arch/, we have a nice simplifying helper in the core code, and you have a tidy platform device to tie it all together. Jason
