Re: [PATCH] IMA,LSM: Uncover hidden variable in ima_match_rules()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 1:21 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The variable name "prop" is inadvertently used twice in
> ima_match_rules(), resulting in incorrect use of the local
> variable when the function parameter should have been.
> Rename the local variable and correct the use if the parameter.

/if/of/

> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Aside from the typo above (which can be fixed during the merge) this
looks good to me.  Based on the discussion in the previous revision it
looks like Roberto would prefer this go via the LSM tree, so I'm going
to merge this into lsm/stable-6.13 and send this up to Linus later
this week (or early next depending on how my holiday travels go);
additional testing is always welcome :)

I'm also going to swap Roberto's reviewed-by tag for his ack which he
gave on the previous revision as this is touching IMA code.

-- 
paul-moore.com





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux