On 13/04/2024 09:15, M. Haener wrote: > From: Michael Haener <michael.haener@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory your patch is touching. A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding". The "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings. See also: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18 > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml > index 3ab4434b7352..af7720dc4a12 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ properties: > - enum: > - infineon,slb9673 > - nuvoton,npct75x > + - st,st33ktpm2xi2c I got only one patch, but if these are compatible, why do you need second patch? Plus binding come before users. Please explain what are you doing in other patch. Best regards, Krzysztof
