> >> Jarkko, I think the emphasis should not be on "machine" from Machine > >> Owner Key (MOK), but on "owner". Whereas Nayna is focusing more on the > >> "_ca" aspect of the name. Perhaps consider naming it > >> "system_owner_ca" or something along those lines. > > What do you gain such overly long identifier? Makes no sense. What > > is "ca aspect of the name" anyway? > > As I mentioned previously, the main usage of this new keyring is that it > should contain only CA keys which can be later used to vouch for user > keys loaded onto secondary or IMA keyring at runtime. Having ca in the > name like .xxxx_ca, would make the keyring name self-describing. Since > you preferred .system, we can call it .system_ca. Sounds good to me. Jarkko? thanks, Mimi
