On 2/19/21 6:16 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
<nramas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/18/21 5:13 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 2/18/21 4:07 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
Hi Mimi,
On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 14:33 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() defined in drivers/of/kexec.c builds
a new device tree object that includes architecture specific data
for kexec system call. This should be defined only if the architecture
being built defines kexec architecture structure "struct kimage_arch".
Define a new boolean config OF_KEXEC that is enabled if
CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE and CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE are enabled, and
the architecture is arm64 or powerpc64. Build drivers/of/kexec.c
if CONFIG_OF_KEXEC is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 33488dc4d61f ("of: Add a common kexec FDT setup function")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
drivers/of/Makefile | 7 +------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
index 18450437d5d5..f2e8fa54862a 100644
--- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
@@ -100,4 +100,10 @@ config OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT
# arches should select this if DMA is coherent by default for OF devices
bool
+config OF_KEXEC
+ bool
+ depends on KEXEC_FILE
+ depends on OF_FLATTREE
+ default y if ARM64 || PPC64
+
endif # OF
diff --git a/drivers/of/Makefile b/drivers/of/Makefile
index c13b982084a3..287579dd1695 100644
--- a/drivers/of/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/of/Makefile
@@ -13,11 +13,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_RESERVED_MEM) += of_reserved_mem.o
obj-$(CONFIG_OF_RESOLVE) += resolver.o
obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.o
obj-$(CONFIG_OF_NUMA) += of_numa.o
-
-ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
-ifdef CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE
-obj-y += kexec.o
-endif
-endif
+obj-$(CONFIG_OF_KEXEC) += kexec.o
obj-$(CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST) += unittest-data/
Is it possible to reuse CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC here?
For ppc64 CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC is selected when CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE is enabled.
So I don't see a problem in reusing CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC for ppc.
But for arm64, CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC is enabled in the final patch in the patch
set (the one for carrying forward IMA log across kexec for arm64). arm64 calls
of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() prior to enabling CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC and hence
breaks the build for arm64.
One problem is that I believe that this patch won't placate the robot,
because IIUC it generates config files at random and this change still
allows hppa and s390 to enable CONFIG_OF_KEXEC.
I enabled CONFIG_OF_KEXEC for s390. With my patch applied,
CONFIG_OF_KEXEC is removed. So I think the robot enabling this config
would not be a problem.
Perhaps a new CONFIG_HAVE_KIMAGE_ARCH option? Not having that option
would still allow building kexec.o, but would be used inside kexec.c to
avoid accessing kimage.arch members.
I think this is a good idea - a new CONFIG_HAVE_KIMAGE_ARCH, which will
be selected by arm64 and ppc for now. I tried this, and it fixes the
build issue.
Although, the name for the new config can be misleading since PARISC,
for instance, also defines "struct kimage_arch". Perhaps,
CONFIG_HAVE_ELF_KIMAGE_ARCH since of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() is
accessing ELF specific fields in "struct kimage_arch"?
Rob/Mimi - please let us know which approach you think is better.
I'd just move the fields to kimage.
I think Mimi's suggestion to use CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC for building
drivers/of/kexec.c would work and also avoid the bisect issue if we do
the following:
- In the patch set for carrying forward the IMA log on kexec, move the
following patch to a later point in the set
"[PATCH v18 04/11] arm64: Use common of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt()"
and merge the above patch with the following patch
"[PATCH v18 11/11] arm64: Enable passing IMA log to next kernel on kexec"
I will try this now, and update.
thanks,
-lakshmi
