Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2/11/21 9:42 AM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> [PATCH] powerpc: Rename kexec elfcorehdr_addr to elf_headers_mem >> This change causes build problem for x86_64 architecture (please see the >> mail from kernel test bot below) since arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h uses >> "elf_load_addr" for the ELF header buffer address and not >> "elf_headers_mem". >> struct kimage_arch { >> ... >> /* Core ELF header buffer */ >> void *elf_headers; >> unsigned long elf_headers_sz; >> unsigned long elf_load_addr; >> }; >> I am thinking of limiting of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() to ARM64 and >> PPC64 since they are the only ones using this function now. >> #if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) && defined(CONFIG_PPC64) > Sorry - I meant to say > #if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_PPC64) > Does it build correctly if you rename elf_headers_mem to elf_load_addr? Or the other way around, renaming x86's elf_load_addr to elf_headers_mem. I don't really have a preference. That would be better than adding an #if condition. >> void *of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(const struct kimage *image, >> unsigned long initrd_load_addr, >> unsigned long initrd_len, >> const char *cmdline) >> { >> ... >> } >> #endif /* defined(CONFIG_ARM64) && defined(CONFIG_PPC64) */ >> Please let me know if you have any concerns. >> thanks, >> -lakshmi -- Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center