On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 15:49 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 1/29/21 2:59 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:46:07PM +0100, Łukasz Majczak wrote: > > > Hi Jarkko, Guenter > > > > > > Yes, here are the logs when failure occurs - > > > https://gist.github.com/semihalf-majczak-lukasz/1575461f585f1e7fb1e9366b8eceaab9 > > > Look for a phrase "TPM returned invalid status" > > > > > > Guenter - good suggestion - I will try to keep it as tight as > > > possible. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Lukasz > > > > Is it possible for you try out with linux-next? Thanks. It's a > > known issue, which ought to be fixed by now. > > > > The log message is harmless, it'a warning not panic, and does not > > endanger system stability. WARN()'s always dump stack trace. No > > oops is happening. > > > > There is a note in the kernel documentation which states: > > Note that the WARN()-family should only be used for "expected to > be unreachable" situations. If you want to warn about "reachable > but undesirable" situations, please use the pr_warn()-family of > functions. It fits the definition. The warning only triggers if the access is in the wrong locality, which should be impossible, so the warning should be unreachable. James > It seems to me that "harmless" doesn't really fit the expected > use of WARN(). Should it possibly be converted to pr_warn() ?
