On 26/01/2021 16:46, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 16:46 +0100, Łukasz Majczak wrote: >> Hi Jarkko, Guenter >> >> Yes, here are the logs when failure occurs - >> https://gist.github.com/semihalf-majczak-lukasz/1575461f585f1e7fb1e9366b8eceaab9 >> Look for a phrase "TPM returned invalid status" > > We've had other reports of this: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/ghsgagsnag.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/374e918c-f167-9308-2bea-ae6bc6a3d2e3@elloe.vision/ > > The problem is some TIS TPMs don't begin in the correct locality so we > have to set it. When I proposed the check, I also proposed a fix for > this problem: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20201001180925.13808-5-James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > This patch solves the error messages on top of -rc5 > But it's part of a series that never went upstream. Part of the reason > was Jarkko proposed the get/put patch to fix this instead, but that > never went upstream either. We need to decide an approach and apply > one or other fixes. > > James > >
