Re: [PATCH] doc: trusted-encrypted: updates with TEE as a new trust source (update)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:45:55PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Hi Mimi and Elaine,
> 
> Apologies for my delayed reply as I was busy with other high priority work.
> 
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 22:14, Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Update trusted key documentation with additional comparisons between
> > discrete TPMs and TEE.
> 
> Isn't this additional comparison limited to a particular type of TPM
> (discrete TPMs) and ignored other TPM implementations (virtual TPM,
> firmware TPM etc.)? I think your later comment about on-chip versus
> off-chip points at these missing pieces as well.
> 
> I would rather suggest comparing TPM and TEE on the basis of
> interfaces and implementation guidelines provided by corresponding
> standards as I think this is the most relevant part to the kernel.

I agree with this point of view.

I'm also finding hard to understand the reason for the thread model
documentation, i.e. how it connects to the implementation.

/Jarkko



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux