Jerry Snitselaar @ 2020-11-30 20:26 MST: > Jerry Snitselaar @ 2020-11-30 19:58 MST: > >> When enabling the interrupt code for the tpm_tis driver we have >> noticed some systems have a bios issue causing an interrupt storm to >> occur. The issue isn't limited to a single tpm or system manufacturer >> so keeping a denylist of systems with the issue isn't optimal. Instead >> try to detect the problem occurring, disable interrupts, and revert to >> polling when it happens. >> >> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx> >> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> v2: drop tpm_tis specific workqueue and use just system_wq >> >> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c >> index 23b60583928b..72cc8a5a152c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c >> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ >> #include <linux/wait.h> >> #include <linux/acpi.h> >> #include <linux/freezer.h> >> +#include <linux/workqueue.h> >> +#include <linux/kernel_stat.h> >> #include "tpm.h" >> #include "tpm_tis_core.h" >> >> @@ -745,9 +747,23 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int dummy, void *dev_id) >> { >> struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_id; >> struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); >> + static bool check_storm = true; >> + static unsigned int check_start; >> u32 interrupt; >> int i, rc; >> >> + if (unlikely(check_storm)) { >> + if (!check_start) { >> + check_start = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies); >> + } else if ((kstat_irqs(priv->irq) > 1000) && >> + (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) - check_start < 500)) { >> + check_storm = false; >> + schedule_work(&priv->storm_work); >> + } else if (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) - check_start >= 500) { >> + check_storm = false; >> + } >> + } >> + >> rc = tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_STATUS(priv->locality), &interrupt); >> if (rc < 0) >> return IRQ_NONE; >> @@ -987,6 +1003,14 @@ static const struct tpm_class_ops tpm_tis = { >> .clk_enable = tpm_tis_clkrun_enable, >> }; >> >> +static void tpm_tis_storm_work(struct work_struct *work) >> +{ >> + struct tpm_tis_data *priv = container_of(work, struct tpm_tis_data, storm_work); >> + >> + disable_interrupts(priv->chip); >> + dev_warn(&priv->chip->dev, "Interrupt storm detected, using polling.\n"); >> +} >> + >> int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq, >> const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops *phy_ops, >> acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle) >> @@ -1003,6 +1027,9 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq, >> if (IS_ERR(chip)) >> return PTR_ERR(chip); >> >> + priv->chip = chip; >> + INIT_WORK(&priv->storm_work, tpm_tis_storm_work); >> + >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI >> chip->acpi_dev_handle = acpi_dev_handle; >> #endif >> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h >> index edeb5dc61c95..5630f294dc0c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h >> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h >> @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ struct tpm_tis_data { >> u16 clkrun_enabled; >> wait_queue_head_t int_queue; >> wait_queue_head_t read_queue; >> + struct work_struct storm_work; >> + struct tpm_chip *chip; >> const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops *phy_ops; >> unsigned short rng_quality; >> }; > > I've tested this with the Intel platform that has an Infineon chip that > I found the other week. It works, but isn't the complete fix. With this > on top of James' patchset I sometimes see the message "Lost Interrupt > waiting for TPM stat", so I guess there needs to be a check in > wait_for_tpm_stat and request_locality to see if interrupts were > disabled when the wait_event_interruptible_timeout call times out. As kernel test robot pointed out. kstat_irqs isn't visible when tpm_tis builds as a module. It looks like it is only called by kstat_irq_usrs, and that is only by the fs/proc code. I have a patch to export it, but the i915 driver open codes their own version instead of using it. Is there any reason not to export it?