On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 21:24, Jerome Forissier <jerome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 5/25/20 3:36 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 15:10, Jerome Forissier <jerome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 5/25/20 1:52 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > >>> Optee device names for sysfs needed to be unique > >> > >> s/Optee/OP-TEE/ > >> s/needed/need/ > >> > >>> and it's better if they will mean something. UUID for name > >>> looks like good solution: > >>> /sys/bus/tee/devices/optee-clnt-<uuid> > >> > >> How about mentioning it is the UUID of the Trusted Application on the > >> TEE side? > >> > > > > Jerome, do you think optee-ta-<uuid> is more suitable here? > > Yes, a bit better I think. More "self explanatory"... kind of :) > +1 > Is it possible to have several devices bound to the same TA? I think > nothing forbids this although we may not have any use case for now... > A single TA is represented via a single device represented via UUID on the TEE bus. And I can't think of a scenario where the user may not want to split the TA so as to support a particular driver in Linux. -Sumit > -- > Jerome > _______________________________________________ > Tee-dev mailing list > Tee-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/tee-dev
