On 5/25/20 3:36 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 15:10, Jerome Forissier <jerome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 5/25/20 1:52 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote: >>> Optee device names for sysfs needed to be unique >> >> s/Optee/OP-TEE/ >> s/needed/need/ >> >>> and it's better if they will mean something. UUID for name >>> looks like good solution: >>> /sys/bus/tee/devices/optee-clnt-<uuid> >> >> How about mentioning it is the UUID of the Trusted Application on the >> TEE side? >> > > Jerome, do you think optee-ta-<uuid> is more suitable here? Yes, a bit better I think. More "self explanatory"... kind of :) Is it possible to have several devices bound to the same TA? I think nothing forbids this although we may not have any use case for now... -- Jerome
