On Sun, 2019-09-08 at 03:10 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > It seems that at least vast majority of the trusted keys patches flow > through my tree to the mainline. Still, it is undocumented in the > MAINTAINERS file. > > So, should I just add my TPM tree as the upstream there? Or should I > just create a new GIT for trusted keys? My TPM PR goes to Linux ATM. > Should my trusted keys PR go to David instead? That would definitely > require own tree. > > With Sumit's recent work trusted keys is turning more than just being > TPM keys so now it is a good time to consider the flow... Sumit, I'm > sorry that I haven't added your first series yet. I need to first sync > up how we are going to move forward. Thanks, Jarkko. Agreed, trusted keys is becoming more than just TPM based keys. Now would be a good time to set up at least a separate branch or GIT repo. Are all "trust" methods equivalent? As new "trust" methods are defined, there should be a document describing the trust method, with a comparison to the TPM. (It would be nice to have some kernel selftests to ensure existing methods don't break.) Mimi
