Re: Should mprotect(..., PROT_EXEC) be checked by IMA?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mimi,

Interesting article. It is almost exactly of what I wanted to be implemented.

If this minor LSM would be stackable to allow combining with e.g. SELinux
then why not.

On 28.03.2019 20:17, Mimi Zohar wrote:
I just came across the grsecurity article on mprotect.[1]
 Has anyone looked at it? Would it make sense to make it a minor LSM?

[1]https://pax.grsecurity.net/docs/mprotect.txt



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux