> -----Original Message----- > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 15:02 > To: Winkler, Tomas <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>; Nayna Jain > <nayna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Usyskin, Alexander > <alexander.usyskin@xxxxxxxxx>; Struk, Tadeusz <tadeusz.struk@xxxxxxxxx>; > linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/21] tpm: move pcr extend code to tpm2-cmd.c > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:58:25AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > > Add tpm2_pcr_extend() function to tpm2-cmd.c with signature > > > > required by tpm-interface.c. It wraps the original open code > implementation. > > > > The original original tpm2_pcr_extend() function is renamed to > > > > __tpm2_pcr_extend() and made static, it is called only from new > > > > tpm2_pcr_extend(). > > > > > > > > Fix warnings in __tpm2_pcr_extend() > > > > tpm2-cmd.c:251:16: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned > > > > integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] > > > > tpm2-cmd.c:252:17: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned > > > > integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > We do not want the signature change, especially because as we are > > > working on getting Roberto's changes in and also because it has > > > absolutely a zero gain. Who cares if those functions take different > parameters? I don't. > > > > Yes, we do care this series tries to have a clean cut between 1.x and 2.x > specs. Please, let's finish one transformation and then move to another. > > I understand that Roberto will have to rebase anyhow, if this series goes in > first, if this is hard I can do it myself, it's trivial. > > > > Tomas > > I'm happy to tune this minor stuff. What minor stuff? This patch is just okay, let's change the API in next round. I'll wait for Nayna to test the one patch > and make those adjustments :-) Would not make sense to roll another series > for these changes. I agree Tomas
