On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:06:23PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 04:51 +1000, James Morris wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:26:55AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > > OK, I was not sure how that discussion went. I could add myself as > > > co-maintainer to MAINTAINERS because I anyway need to go through > > > all of these. > > > > > > If anyone does not vote against, I'll send a patch. > > > > > > > For Keys? That would would be useful to help reduce the workload on > > David. > > Well, no, this was for trusted keys, which is the part of the key > infrastructure that goes via the TPM: The KEYS-TRUSTED part in the > MAINTAINERs file. There's still KEYS-ENCRYPTED, KEYS/KEYRING and > ASYMETRIC KEYS, which don't use the TPM. > > However, I've no objection to consolidating the lot under a larger set > of maintainers ... I recently agreed to look at the asymmetric key TPM > patch because it's my area, but it also strays over into crypto, > keyring and asymmetric keys. Should 2/2 be rolled through my tree? 1/2 is a tpm patch. /Jarkko
