On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 04:51 +1000, James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:26:55AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > OK, I was not sure how that discussion went. I could add myself as > > co-maintainer to MAINTAINERS because I anyway need to go through > > all of these. > > > > If anyone does not vote against, I'll send a patch. > > > > For Keys? That would would be useful to help reduce the workload on > David. Well, no, this was for trusted keys, which is the part of the key infrastructure that goes via the TPM: The KEYS-TRUSTED part in the MAINTAINERs file. There's still KEYS-ENCRYPTED, KEYS/KEYRING and ASYMETRIC KEYS, which don't use the TPM. However, I've no objection to consolidating the lot under a larger set of maintainers ... I recently agreed to look at the asymmetric key TPM patch because it's my area, but it also strays over into crypto, keyring and asymmetric keys. James