Re: [-next PATCH] security: use octal not symbolic permissions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [-next PATCH] security: use octal not symbolic permissions
From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:49:47 -0700
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180613151921.GA27375@mail.hallyn.com>

On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 10:19 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Using octal and not symbolic permissions is preferred by many as more
> > readable.
> > 
> > see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/2/1945
> 
> Heh, well see also https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/2/2062 .

We all love Al.

I did reply then too.

cheers, Joe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [-next PATCH] security: use octal not symbolic permissions
  - From: Joe Perches
- Re: [-next PATCH] security: use octal not symbolic permissions
  - From: Serge E. Hallyn

Prev by Date: Re: [-next PATCH] security: use octal not symbolic permissions
Next by Date: Re: [USER] [PATCH 1/2] Remove hardcoding of SHA1 in EVM signatures
Previous by thread: Re: [-next PATCH] security: use octal not symbolic permissions
Next by thread: [PATCH v3 0/2] tpm: add support for nonblocking operation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Kernel Hardening] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux