On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 07:26:03PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 12/20/2017 07:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 03:19:19PM +0000, Shaikh, Azhar wrote: > >>> This flag is only used to warn if CLKRUN_EN wasn't disabled on Braswell > >>> systems, but the only way this can happen is if the code is not correct. > >>> > >>> So it's an unnecessary check that just makes the code harder to read. > >> > >> This code was implemented as a suggestion from Jason on the previous patches. > >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/msg00827.html > > > > The concept was to be like ASSERT_RTNL, maybe it just needs a suitably > > named static inline to addrress Javier's readability concerns? > > > > I really think is not worth it and pollutes all the tpm_tcg_{read,write} > functions with those is_bsw() and flags checks. Your example is different > since is a core API used by in lot of places in the kernel, but it's not > the case here. > > But I don't have a strong opinion either, it was Jarkko who questioned > the value of the flag so I can drop this patch too if you disagree with > the change. I'm mostly interested in PATCH 4/4 that's the actual fix. Not going to fight over this one. I would apply the patch but if there is strong opposition I can reconsider. /Jarkko
