On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 02:57:10AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > This will add an unwanted delay on ACPI systems that handle power > sequencing in firmware. However use of "optional" regulators is frowned > upon in this case as the supply in reality is not optional. > Mark, has there been any developments that would help reconciling > difference in behavior between ACPI and DT systems. Ideally we'd need to > know when supply was turned on, and adjust the wait accordingly. There's not been any changes here, but there's always been an event availalbe when a regulator is turned on? There's also no difference between DT and ACPI systems here, both could have the regulator fixed on and I'd certainly not want to rely on an ACPI system implementing a device specific delay after power on given the sort of stuff they like to put into machine specific drivers.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
