On Fri, 27 Sep 2024, at 7:24 PM, Markus Elfring wrote: >>> How much would you like to care for standard compliance concerns >>> together with your software developments? >> >> I only ask about because it seems to deviate from everything else I've viewed. For example the older `asus-wmi.h` has: >> >> #ifndef _ASUS_WMI_H_ >> #define _ASUS_WMI_H_ > > Such a naming approach is “popular”, isn't it? > > >> and every other header in the drivers/platform/x86 dir is similar. If what I'm supposed to is omit the leading `_` then sure I'll do it, it's not of any consequence to me. > > I dare to propose possibilities to take safer identifier selections > better into account. > I hope that we can benefit more from corresponding collateral evolution. My sincerest apologies if I missed something in my tone when trying to convey might thoughts - for some things I am still learning in regards to C (I am mostly rust) and the difference was a curious thing to me. The code is now updated to match your suggestion. > Regards, > Markus
