>> How much would you like to care for standard compliance concerns >> together with your software developments? > > I only ask about because it seems to deviate from everything else I've viewed. For example the older `asus-wmi.h` has: > > #ifndef _ASUS_WMI_H_ > #define _ASUS_WMI_H_ Such a naming approach is “popular”, isn't it? > and every other header in the drivers/platform/x86 dir is similar. If what I'm supposed to is omit the leading `_` then sure I'll do it, it's not of any consequence to me. I dare to propose possibilities to take safer identifier selections better into account. I hope that we can benefit more from corresponding collateral evolution. Regards, Markus
