On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 16:14 +0530, sandeep.cs wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 14:49 +0530, Sandeep C S wrote: Generally, it's better to refactor code that checkpatch bleats about than merely shutting up the warning. > > For this block, I think a rewrite using memcmp would be clearer. > > Something like: > Okay . Thanks for your valuable feedback. We will promptly address your > suggestions and enhance our code accordingly. > And also please review other patch set as well. Another way to write the input_mapping function is using a static const struct and a for loop like: static int samsung_kbd_mouse_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi, struct hid_field *field, struct hid_usage *usage, unsigned long **bit, int *max) { struct usb_interface *intf = to_usb_interface(hdev->dev.parent); unsigned short ifnum = intf->cur_altsetting->desc.bInterfaceNumber; static const struct { unsigned hid; __u16 map; } samsung_hid_key_map[] = { {0x183, KEY_MEDIA}, {0x195, KEY_EMAIL}, {0x196, KEY_CALC}, {0x197, KEY_COMPUTER}, {0x22b, KEY_SEARCH}, {0x22c, KEY_WWW}, {0x22d, KEY_BACK}, {0x22e, KEY_FORWARD}, {0x22f, KEY_FAVORITES}, {0x230, KEY_REFRESH}, {0x231, KEY_STOP}, }; int i; unsigned hid; if (1 != ifnum || HID_UP_CONSUMER != (usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE)) return 0; hid = usage->hid & HID_USAGE; dbg_hid("samsung wireless keyboard/mouse input mapping event [0x%x]\n", hid); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(samsung_hid_key_map); i++) { if (hid == samsung_hid_key_map[i].hid) { hid_map_usage_clear(hi, usage, bit, max, EV_KEY, samsung_hid_key_map[i].map); return 1; } } return 0; }