>> Thus return directly after a call of the function “kzalloc” failed >> at the beginning. > > This is not needed. The same arguments as on the patch to > usbtouchscreen.c. I suggest to avoid redundant data processing a bit more. Regards, Markus
>> Thus return directly after a call of the function “kzalloc” failed >> at the beginning. > > This is not needed. The same arguments as on the patch to > usbtouchscreen.c. I suggest to avoid redundant data processing a bit more. Regards, Markus