Re: [PATCH] HID: Recognize "Digitizer" as a valid input application

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Following up on this since it has been a while since the last attempt.
I'm still hoping to get this patch merged if possible :)

The patch still applies cleanly against the for-6.4/core branch and
the hid-tools test suite still runs without any (new*) test failures
when the patch is applied. Please let me know if there's anything I
could / should do to continue moving this forward.


*There are four failures in test_sony.py, but they occur on the
for-6.4/core branch regardless of if the patch is applied or not.

Jason
---
Now instead of four in the eights place /
you’ve got three, ‘Cause you added one  /
(That is to say, eight) to the two,     /
But you can’t take seven from three,    /
So you look at the sixty-fours....


On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 8:11 AM Jason Gerecke <killertofu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the response, Jose.
>
> Unfortunately this isn't an issue that we can fix in the Wacom driver
> since it affects devices that don't use the Wacom driver. While we
> could theoretically adopt affected VID:PIDs into the Wacom driver on a
> case-by-case basis, there would be a large time lag between us
> adopting a device and users running the required kernel. This should
> really be something that is fixed in the hid-generic driver, even if
> it means some pain trying to ensure we don't break things in the
> process... I'm still hoping to hear something back from Benjamin about
> my hid-tools test results or if additional testing is needed.
>
> Jason
> ---
> Now instead of four in the eights place /
> you’ve got three, ‘Cause you added one  /
> (That is to say, eight) to the two,     /
> But you can’t take seven from three,    /
> So you look at the sixty-fours....
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 3:43 AM José Expósito <jose.exposito89@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > > Still waiting to hear back about this. Are positive results from the
> > > hid-tools tests sufficient, or is there additional work that should be
> > > done for this patch?
> >
> > A while ago a similar patch was sent [1] and it was in a similar status
> > to your patch for a while, so I decided to fix the issue in the UCLogic
> > driver [2].
> >
> > I can not tell you if this patch needs additional work, but you might be
> > interested in fixing it in the Wacom driver, where it'd be easier for you
> > to test that no regressions are introduced.
> >
> > I hope this helps a bit,
> > Jose
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20220804151832.30373-1-openglfreak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/d08049f2-443b-f769-cfde-629cdfb96fc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux