On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Basavaraj Natikar wrote: > Add a check for num_hid_devices to handle special case in the situation > of "no sensors" for SFH1.1. Could you please provide a little bit more verbose changelog here? Namely, what problem does it cause when we don't return ENODEV in !cl_data->num_hid_devices case (and thus why this patch is needed in the first place). Thanks. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
