Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: adc-joystick: add poll-interval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 4:48 PM Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le lun., juin 27 2022 at 17:41:37 -0500, Chris Morgan
> <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:33:28PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >>  Hi Chris,
> >>
> >>  Le lun., juin 27 2022 at 17:14:42 -0500, Chris Morgan
> >>  <macroalpha82@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> >>  > Add poll-interval support for the adc-joystick documentation.
> >> This is
> >>  > an optional value and if not provided the adc-joystick works as it
> >>  > does today (with triggered buffers). If this value is provided,
> >> the
> >>  > adc-joystick driver is polled at the specified interval.
> >>  >
> >>  > Signed-off-by: Maya Matuszczyk <maccraft123mc@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>  > Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>  > ---
> >>  >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml | 6
> >> ++++++
> >>  >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>  >
> >>  > diff --git
> >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
> >>  > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
> >>  > index 2ee04e03bc22..2d755091e46d 100644
> >>  > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
> >>  > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
> >>  > @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ properties:
> >>  >    compatible:
> >>  >      const: adc-joystick
> >>  >
> >>  > +  poll-interval:
> >>  > +    description:
> >>  > +      Poll interval time in milliseconds. If not specified,
> >> device will
> >>  > use
> >>  > +      triggered buffer.
> >>
> >>  It doesn't have to use *triggered* buffer - it can use regular
> >> buffer as
> >>  well.
> >>
> >>  The property should use a unit suffix, as explained here:
> >>
> >> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdevicetree-org%2Fdt-schema%2Fblob%2Fmain%2Fdtschema%2Fschemas%2Fproperty-units.yaml&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cf6306210eda84b58f7f408da588d1627%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637919660856597552%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NVqhWKdycQsv0ksiILD8aH%2BnZ6aji%2BhNxSEwBkQlZC0%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >>  So it should be named poll-interval-ms.
> >>
> >>  Cheers,
> >>  -Paul
> >
> > Understood, though the logic here was to be consistent with existing
> > implementations (such as adc-keys and gpio-keys-polled) which all
> > use poll-interval (no ms). Honest question, would it be better to be
> > right (poll-interval-ms) or consistent (poll-interval) in this case?
>
> I guess those don't have a suffix for legacy reasons, and newly
> introduced properties should follow the standard.
>
> But I guess that's a question for DT maintainers.

It should be consistent with the rest of the input bindings.

Rob




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux