Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: adc-joystick: add poll-interval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:33:28PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> Le lun., juin 27 2022 at 17:14:42 -0500, Chris Morgan
> <macroalpha82@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > Add poll-interval support for the adc-joystick documentation. This is
> > an optional value and if not provided the adc-joystick works as it
> > does today (with triggered buffers). If this value is provided, the
> > adc-joystick driver is polled at the specified interval.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maya Matuszczyk <maccraft123mc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
> > index 2ee04e03bc22..2d755091e46d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
> > @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ properties:
> >    compatible:
> >      const: adc-joystick
> > 
> > +  poll-interval:
> > +    description:
> > +      Poll interval time in milliseconds. If not specified, device will
> > use
> > +      triggered buffer.
> 
> It doesn't have to use *triggered* buffer - it can use regular buffer as
> well.
> 
> The property should use a unit suffix, as explained here:
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdevicetree-org%2Fdt-schema%2Fblob%2Fmain%2Fdtschema%2Fschemas%2Fproperty-units.yaml&amp;data=05%7C01%7C%7Cf6306210eda84b58f7f408da588d1627%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637919660856597552%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=NVqhWKdycQsv0ksiILD8aH%2BnZ6aji%2BhNxSEwBkQlZC0%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> So it should be named poll-interval-ms.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Paul

Understood, though the logic here was to be consistent with existing
implementations (such as adc-keys and gpio-keys-polled) which all
use poll-interval (no ms). Honest question, would it be better to be
right (poll-interval-ms) or consistent (poll-interval) in this case?

Thank you.

> 
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +
> >    io-channels:
> >      minItems: 1
> >      maxItems: 1024
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> > 
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux