RE:(2) (2) (3) (2) (2) Request for reverting the commit for Samsung HID driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Any problmes with my email style?


Anyway, If your commit has to be maintained, the patches I'm going to pu in won't work anyway.
My patches is only for Bluetooth. But your commit restircts usage of Bluetooth devices.

What do you think of making new function like "hid_is_bluetooth"?


 
--------- Original Message ---------
Sender : gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date : 2022-03-30 18:26 (GMT+9)
Title : Re: (2) (3) (2) (2) Request for reverting the commit for Samsung HID driver
 
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
 
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
 
 
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
 
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 06:20:58PM +0900, 조준완 wrote:
> 
> No. If so, I will not apply in house patches.
 
I do not understand what you are referencing here, sorry.  Please
explain.
 
> I'm a Bluetooth person, and I'm only interested in Bluetooth devices.
 
That's fine, but this driver, as is in the tree today, does not support
bluetooth devices.  Please submit a patch to resolve that.
 
> Codes for Bluetooth devices will never be worked along the commit, anyway, no reason to include them.
 
I do not understand.  Please explain.
 
thanks,
 
greg k-h
 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux