Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: input: cros-ec-keyb: Add a new property

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:30 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Philip Chen (2021-01-13 17:25:12)
> > This patch adds a new property `function-row-physmap` to the
>
> :)
Sorry, I'll make it imperative tense.
>
> > device tree for the custom keyboard top row design.
> >
> > The property describes the rows/columns of the top row keys
> > from left to right.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philip Chen <philipchen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - add minItems and maxItems for `function-row-physmap`
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - add `function-row-physmap` instead of `google,custom-keyb-top-row`
> >
> >  .../bindings/input/google,cros-ec-keyb.yaml          | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/google,cros-ec-keyb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/google,cros-ec-keyb.yaml
> > index 8e50c14a9d778..e573ef3e58b65 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/google,cros-ec-keyb.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/google,cros-ec-keyb.yaml
> > @@ -31,6 +31,18 @@ properties:
> >        if the EC does not have its own logic or hardware for this.
> >      type: boolean
> >
> > +  function-row-physmap:
> > +    $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array'
>
> I'm not sure this is needed if min/max items is there.
>
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +    maxItems: 15
> > +    description: |
> > +      An ordered u32 array describing the rows/columns (in the scan matrix)
> > +      of top row keys from physical left (KEY_F1) to right. Each entry
> > +      encodes the row/column as:
> > +      (((row) & 0xFF) << 24) | (((column) & 0xFF) << 16)
> > +      where the lower 16 bits are reserved. This property is specified only
> > +      when the keyboard has a custom design for the top row keys.
>
> Can you add it to the example so it can be tested? Then you can prove
> out if the ref is needed or not.
Sure, I'll give it a try.
>
> > +
> >  required:
> >    - compatible
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux