On 20-05-11 10:53, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 01:06:44PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > On 20-05-09 12:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Hi Macro,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:28:16PM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > > Since commit b6eba86030bf ("Input: edt-ft5x06 - add offset support for
> > > > ev-ft5726") offset-x and offset-y is supported. Devices using those
> > > > offset parameters don't support the offset parameter so we need to add
> > > > the NO_REGISTER check for edt_ft5x06_ts_get_defaults().
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: b6eba86030bf ("Input: edt-ft5x06 - add offset support for ev-ft5726")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > I'll apply this, but I wonder if we should not move this check into
> > > edt_ft5x06_register_write(), and also have edt_ft5x06_register_read()
> > > return error if address is "NO_REGISTER"?
> >
> > I tought so too but I wanted to keep the fix small and backportable.
>
> Any chance you can make a follow-up patch so that going forward it is
> cleaner (and the fix can still be backported if needed)?
Of course I will prepare a fix.
Regards,
Marco
> Thanks.
>
