On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 08:29:13PM -0500, Jeff LaBundy wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thank you for your prompt review.
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:22:54PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:11:18PM -0500, Jeff LaBundy wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Each frame contains at most one wheel event (up or down), in which
> > > + * case a full keystroke is emulated.
> > > + */
> > > + if (event_flags & BIT(IQS62X_EVENT_WHEEL_UP)) {
> > > + input_report_key(iqs62x_keys->input,
> > > + iqs62x_keys->keycode[IQS62X_EVENT_WHEEL_UP],
> > > + 0);
> > > + input_sync(iqs62x_keys->input);
> > > + } else if (event_flags & BIT(IQS62X_EVENT_WHEEL_DN)) {
> > > + input_report_key(iqs62x_keys->input,
> > > + iqs62x_keys->keycode[IQS62X_EVENT_WHEEL_DN],
> > > + 0);
> >
> > Not '1'?
> >
>
> We pick up the '1' in the first of the two for loops above so long as the wheel
> moved "enough." In this case (and this case only), a subsequent '0' is sent to
> emulate a full press/release cycle (2 * {EV_KEY + EV_SYN}) for wheel "ticks."
>
> I will update the comment to say "...in which case a complementary release cycle
> is emulated." If I have misunderstood your concern, please let me know.
Ah, sorry, no, I misread the code.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
