On Fri, 3 May 2019, Fabien DESSENNE wrote: > >> - ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, &rmi_irq_teardown, hdata); > >> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, rmi_irq_teardown, hdata); > > Why do you think this is wrong C? > > Because I was not aware that both func and &func refer to the same > function pointer. > > Now I know :) Yup, it's defined in 6.3.2.1.4 in C99. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
