Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 11:35, Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:29 AM Clément VUCHENER > <clement.vuchener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 10:45, Benjamin Tissoires > > <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:25 AM Clément VUCHENER > > > <clement.vuchener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 09:40, Benjamin Tissoires > > > > <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > Hi Clément, > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:34 PM Clément VUCHENER > > > > > <clement.vuchener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried again to add hi-res wheel support for the G500 with Hans de > > > > > > Goede's latest patch series you've just merged in for-5.2/logitech, it > > > > > > is much better but there is still some issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is the device index, I need to use device index 0 > > > > > > instead 0xff. I added a quick and dirty quirk (stealing in the > > > > > > QUIRK_CLASS range since the normal quirk range looks full) to change > > > > > > the device index assigned in __hidpp_send_report. After that the > > > > > > device is correctly initialized and the wheel multiplier is set. > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, maybe we should restrain a little bit the reserved quirks... > > > > > But actually, .driver_data and .quirks are both unsigned long, so you > > > > > should be able to use the 64 bits. > > > > > > > > Only on 64 bits architectures, or is the kernel forcing long integers > > > > to be 64 bits everywhere? > > > > > > Damnit, you are correct, there is no such enforcement :/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The second issue is that wheel values are not actually scaled > > > > > > according to the multiplier. I get 7/8 full scroll event for each > > > > > > wheel step. I think it happens because the mouse is split in two > > > > > > devices. The first device has the wheel events, and the second device > > > > > > has the HID++ reports. The wheel multiplier is only set on the second > > > > > > device (where the hi-res mode is enabled) and does not affect the > > > > > > wheel events from the first one. > > > > > > > > > > I would think this have to do with the device not accepting the > > > > > command instead. Can you share some raw logs of the events (ideally > > > > > with hid-recorder from > > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libevdev/hid-tools)? > > > > > > > > I already checked with usbmon and double-checked by querying the > > > > register. The flag is set and accepted by the device and it behaves > > > > accordingly: it sends about 8 wheel events per step. > > > > > > OK, that's what I wanted to see. > > > > > > > > > > > hid-recorder takes hidraw nodes as parameters, how do I use it to > > > > record the initialization by the driver? > > > > > > You can't. But it doesn't really matter here because I wanted to check > > > what your mouse is actually sending after the initialization. > > > > > > So if I read correctly: the mouse is sending high res data but > > > evemu-recorder shows one REL_WHEEL event every 7/8 clicks? > > > > It is HID++ 1.0, there is no special high res data report, it sends > > standard HID mouse wheel report, but more of them. > > > > To be clear, here is a recording using the modified kernel. I moved > > the wheel one step up (8 events are generated), then one step down (8 > > events again + a 2-event bump). > > > > # EVEMU 1.3 > [snipped] > > E: 1.975014 8 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 > > > > The hi-res events should +/-15 instead of +/-120, and less REL_WHEEL > > events should be generated. This looks like the multiplier is set to 1 > > instead of 8. > > > > kernel log shows the multiplier is set but only for one of the two devices: > > > > input: Logitech G500 as > > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.0/0003:046D:C068.0006/input/input25 > > hid-generic 0003:046D:C068.0006: input,hidraw5: USB HID v1.11 Mouse > > [Logitech G500] on usb-0000:00:14.0-2/input0 > > input: Logitech G500 Keyboard as > > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.1/0003:046D:C068.0007/input/input26 > > input: Logitech G500 Consumer Control as > > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.1/0003:046D:C068.0007/input/input27 > > hid-generic 0003:046D:C068.0007: input,hiddev97,hidraw6: USB HID v1.11 > > Keyboard [Logitech G500] on usb-0000:00:14.0-2/input1 > > input: Logitech G500 as > > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.0/0003:046D:C068.0006/input/input30 > > logitech-hidpp-device 0003:046D:C068.0006: input,hidraw5: USB HID > > v1.11 Mouse [Logitech G500] on usb-0000:00:14.0-2/input0 > > logitech-hidpp-device 0003:046D:C068.0007: HID++ 1.0 device connected. > > logitech-hidpp-device 0003:046D:C068.0007: multiplier = 8 > > input: Logitech G500 as > > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-2/1-2:1.1/0003:046D:C068.0007/input/input31 > > logitech-hidpp-device 0003:046D:C068.0007: input,hiddev97,hidraw6: USB > > HID v1.11 Keyboard [Logitech G500] on usb-0000:00:14.0-2/input1 > > > > Oh, now I see. And yes you are correct. > > I wonder if we should not consider the mouse in hid-logitech-dj then. > And let hid-logitech-dj merge the 2 nodes together into one hidpp > device, and so we are facing a "regular" HID++ device which is > consistent. This would change how userspace see the devices, isn't it? And I don't like the dj hidraw nodes, they mess with the device index: you get answers with a device index different from the one used in the corresponding request. > > Unfortunately, I am not sure I'll have the time to work on it this week :/ > > Cheers, > Benjamin > > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 19 déc. 2018 à 21:35, Benjamin Tissoires > > > > > > <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:57 AM Clément VUCHENER > > > > > > > <clement.vuchener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 15 déc. 2018 à 15:45, Clément VUCHENER > > > > > > > > <clement.vuchener@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 14 déc. 2018 à 19:37, Harry Cutts <hcutts@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Clement, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 05:47, Clément VUCHENER > > > > > > > > > > <clement.vuchener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, The G500s (and the G500 too, I think) does support the "scrolling > > > > > > > > > > > acceleration" bit. If I set it, I get around 8 events for each wheel > > > > > > > > > > > "click", this is what this driver expects, right? If I understood > > > > > > > > > > > correctly, I should try this patch with the > > > > > > > > > > > HIDPP_QUIRK_HI_RES_SCROLL_1P0 quirk set for my mouse. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the info! Yes, that should work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, it is not that simple. I get "Device not connected" errors for > > > > > > > > > both interfaces of the mouse. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suspect the device is not responding because the hid device is not > > > > > > > > started. When is hid_hw_start supposed to be called? It is called > > > > > > > > early for HID_QUIRK_CLASS_G920 but later for other device. So the > > > > > > > > device is not started when hidpp_is_connected is called. Is this > > > > > > > > because most of the device in this driver are not real HID devices but > > > > > > > > DJ devices? How should non-DJ devices be treated? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Clement, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a series I sent last September that allows to support non DJ > > > > > > > devices on logitech-hidpp > > > > > > > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/list/?series=16359). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In its current form, with the latest upstream kernel, the series will > > > > > > > oops during the .event() callback, which is easy enough to fix. > > > > > > > However, I am currently trying to make it better as a second or third > > > > > > > reading made me realized that there was a bunch of non-sense in it and > > > > > > > a proper support would require slightly more work for the non unifying > > > > > > > receiver case. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope I'll be able to send out something by the end of the week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Benjamin
