Hi,
On 01-04-19 13:11, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01-04-19 12:34, Peter Hutterer wrote:
<snip>
I noticed you left BTN_TASK in the #defines, any specific reason for that
over using BTN_EXTRA3 for that one?
My main focus was making 0x113 some form of back and 0x114 some form of forward
and making 0x115/0x116 NOT have back / forward in their names BTN_TASK is 0x117
so I left it alone. But I'm fine with making it BTN_EXTRA3, I agree that would be
more consistent.
Peter, any preference for keeping BTN_TASK as is (less churn) vs changing it
to BTN_EXTRA3 (more consistent) ?
Regards,
Hans
