Dear Marcus, On 15.07.2018 10:42, Marcus Folkesson wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 08:51:09AM +0000, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 10:09:20AM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote: >>> Hi Alexey, >>> >>> Good catch! >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:07:57PM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote: >>>> pxrc_probe() calls usb_get_dev(), but there is no usb_put_dev() >>>> anywhere in the driver. >>>> >>>> The patch adds one to error handling code and to pxrc_isconnect(). >>>> >>>> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org). >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Hmm, the biggest question however if we need to "take" the device, as I >> do not think interface can outlive the device, and whether we actually >> need to store it in pxrc, as we only need it during set up, as far as I >> can see. > > Yep, the device is only used during setup. > I interpret the comments for usb_get_dev() as you should take a > reference count on the device even if you only use the interface, but I > could be wrong. > >>From usb_get_dev():: > > * usb_get_dev - increments the reference count of the usb device structure > * @dev: the device being referenced > * > * Each live reference to a device should be refcounted. > * > * Drivers for USB interfaces should normally record such references in > * their probe() methods, when they bind to an interface, and release > * them by calling usb_put_dev(), in their disconnect() methods. > > I can fix the driver to not take the device if that is what we want. > If not Alexey want to fix it of course, it is his catch :-) As far as I can see the proposed solution requires some refactoring of the init code. So, I believe the author is in the better position to do that. Best regards, Alexey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html