On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:02:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:55:31PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > Patch series adding support for ROHM BD71837 PMIC. > > > > > What is the preferred way when I send updated patches: > > > > 1. always resend _all_ unapplied patches even if there is no changes to > > some of them. (patch-vN mail thread contains _all_ unapplied patches) > > 2. only resend changed patches (patch-vN mail thread contains only > > patches that were changed from patch-vN-1) > > > > I have currently used approach 1 - so that no patches would be > > accidentally forgotten - but downside is that people need to check if > > they have already reviewed some of the patches. I'd rather not caused > > any extra work. What is the most convenient way for you guys? > > Option 1 is preferred. > > Just ensure you apply any tags you have collected so reviewers can see > which patches are pending a review. It's also a good idea to keep a > succinct change log between the "--" marker and the diff stat where > you can state "v4: No change" or the like. Right. Thanks. Just one question - what if I get reviewed-by for a patch which I later rework? Like this MFD patch where I got reviewed-by from Linus Walleij for v6 - but which I reworked due to comments from Enric and Dmitry. I have not kept the reviewed-by as the patch is not exactly the same Linus was originally reviewing. I guess the tags should be only kept for patches which are unchanged, right? > > -- > Lee Jones [李琼斯] > Linaro Services Technical Lead > Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs > Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
