On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:55:31PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > Patch series adding support for ROHM BD71837 PMIC. > > > What is the preferred way when I send updated patches: > > 1. always resend _all_ unapplied patches even if there is no changes to > some of them. (patch-vN mail thread contains _all_ unapplied patches) > 2. only resend changed patches (patch-vN mail thread contains only > patches that were changed from patch-vN-1) > > I have currently used approach 1 - so that no patches would be > accidentally forgotten - but downside is that people need to check if > they have already reviewed some of the patches. I'd rather not caused > any extra work. What is the most convenient way for you guys? Option 1 is preferred. Just ensure you apply any tags you have collected so reviewers can see which patches are pending a review. It's also a good idea to keep a succinct change log between the "--" marker and the diff stat where you can state "v4: No change" or the like. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
