On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:25:28PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Arkadiusz Hiler <arek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I would like to know why reverting a serious regression caused by single line > > change is taking almost a month now. > > Dmitry? It does sound like reverting is a complete no-brainer, and > should have happened immediately. > > Sure, it looks like it might a bug in the rmi code, but that does not > excuse a regression. Sorry, I checked out for the last few weeks, I should be getting back to upstream now. I'll prepare a pull request shortly. > > Added Andrew Duggan too, since he is the source of that > non-functioning rmi code. > > Andrew, see > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/8/120 > > for the rmi issues on resume. I believe this is not really RMI issue but Lenovo BIOS issue with it poking into SMbus controller ranges: On [many] affected systems on suspend we see: i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: BIOS is accessing SMBus registers i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: Driver SMBus register access inhibited and naturally the touchpad and trackpoint (if present) are dead afterwards. There is a proposed workaround for this from Lyude Paul: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/26/696 but it is stalled, so at this point rever is indeed prudent. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html