On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 21:37:48 +0200,
Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 21:43:58 +0200,
> > Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> +static struct bus_type ac97_bus_type = {
> >> + .name = "ac97",
> >
> > Name-conflict with the old ac97 bus?
> Yeah, fair point. So what should I choose for this new one ?
> - ac97new
> - ac97bis
> - ac97_2
> - ac97reborn
ac97bus
ac97_episode_5
ac98
...
I have no opinion on it.
> >> +static int __init ac97_bus_init(void)
> >> +{
> >> + return bus_register(&ac97_bus_type);
> >> +}
> >> +subsys_initcall(ac97_bus_init);
> >> +
> >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>");
> >
> > No bus_unregister() at exit?
> Mmmh, that's because I used subsys_initcall(), which doesn't look good in a
> module compilation setup. That will require a module_init(), and I will think
> about how to implement it and test it for next iteration.
You can use subsys_init() for modules, it's no problem.
When it's built for a module, all xxx_init() is handled as equivalent
with module_init(). See linux/module.h.
It's just the lack of module_exit() in your case.
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
