Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 21:43:58 +0200, > Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> +static struct bus_type ac97_bus_type = { >> + .name = "ac97", > > Name-conflict with the old ac97 bus? Yeah, fair point. So what should I choose for this new one ? - ac97new - ac97bis - ac97_2 - ac97reborn >> +static int __init ac97_bus_init(void) >> +{ >> + return bus_register(&ac97_bus_type); >> +} >> +subsys_initcall(ac97_bus_init); >> + >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>"); > > No bus_unregister() at exit? Mmmh, that's because I used subsys_initcall(), which doesn't look good in a module compilation setup. That will require a module_init(), and I will think about how to implement it and test it for next iteration. Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html