Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] gpio: acpi: Don't return 0 on acpi_gpio_count()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's unusual to have error checking like (ret <= 0) in cases when
> counting GPIO resources. In case when it's mandatory we propagate the
> error (-ENOENT), otherwise we don't use the result.
>
> This makes consistent behaviour across all possible variants called in
> gpiod_count().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Mika/Rafael, can you look at this patch?

(Andy: sorry for late reply, busy merge window...)

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux