[PATCH v1 1/4] gpio: acpi: Don't return 0 on acpi_gpio_count()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It's unusual to have error checking like (ret <= 0) in cases when
counting GPIO resources. In case when it's mandatory we propagate the
error (-ENOENT), otherwise we don't use the result.

This makes consistent behaviour across all possible variants called in
gpiod_count().

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
index 9b37a3692b3f..d7a22c470312 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ int acpi_gpio_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
 					break;
 				}
 		}
-		if (count >= 0)
+		if (count > 0)
 			break;
 	}
 
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ int acpi_gpio_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
 		if (crs_count > 0)
 			count = crs_count;
 	}
-	return count;
+	return count ? count : -ENOENT;
 }
 
 struct acpi_crs_lookup {
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux