On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Roderick Colenbrander <roderick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: >> >> > In your case, I think using IIO is just non sense. The accelerometers >> > found on the DS4 are meant to be used as a stream of data, which is not >> > what IIO was made for. Plus, if you start exporting accelerometers as >> > IIO, how will the DE differentiate between the DS4 accelerometer and the >> > integrated one. >> >> Fair enough, after re-reading the whole thing, I agree that IIO is not the >> best aproach here. So let's just proceed as originally planned. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Jiri Kosina >> SUSE Labs >> > > That's great news :) Do you want me to resend the patches? The series from > December should still apply though. We may add another 1 or 2 patches later, > but they will build on top of the ones sent so far. (resubmit in plain form) That's great news :) Do you want me to resend the patches? The series from December should still apply though. We may add another 1 or 2 patches later, but they will build on top of the ones sent so far. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
