Hi Jiri,
On 19.12.2016 11:53, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Dennis Wassenberg wrote:
>
>> "led_set_func_hid_lenovo" is set to "hid_lenovo_led_set"
>>
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HID_LENOVO)
>> +static int hda_fixup_thinkpad_hid_prepare(struct hda_codec *codec)
>> +{
>> + struct hda_gen_spec *spec = codec->spec;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!is_thinkpad(codec))
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + if (!led_set_func_hid_lenovo)
>> + led_set_func_hid_lenovo = symbol_request(hid_lenovo_led_set);
>>
>> "hid_lenovo_led_set" is introduced in "[PATCH v2 2/2] hda:
>> thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED control". This means
>> that "[PATCH 4/4] hda: thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED
>> control" can only work with applied "[PATCH 1/4] hid-lenovo: Add support
>> for X1 Tablet cover special keys" and "[PATCH v2 2/2] hda:
>> thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED control".
>
> Ah, okay, I wasn't aware of the other patchset. These two probably should
> be merged together. Is the other 2-patch set merged in any tree already?
> Where has it been submitted to?
>
No 1/4, 2/4 and 3/4 are currently not merged to any tree. I reworked 1/4, 2/4 and 3/4 because of some comments from Benjamin Tissoires (mail from 14th September 2016).
The patches are submitted to all recipients at the To, CC-Line (e.g. linux-input mailing list).
Maybe I can merge 2/4 and 4/4 together. This is all for LED control. 1/4 is for key/input handling and 3/4 is a special FNLock handling where I should use a separate patch.
Currently I have no feedback regarding the reworked linux-input specific code. I hope I will get it soon :)
Best regards,
Dennis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
