On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Dennis Wassenberg wrote:
> "led_set_func_hid_lenovo" is set to "hid_lenovo_led_set"
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HID_LENOVO)
> +static int hda_fixup_thinkpad_hid_prepare(struct hda_codec *codec)
> +{
> + struct hda_gen_spec *spec = codec->spec;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!is_thinkpad(codec))
> + return -ENODEV;
> + if (!led_set_func_hid_lenovo)
> + led_set_func_hid_lenovo = symbol_request(hid_lenovo_led_set);
>
> "hid_lenovo_led_set" is introduced in "[PATCH v2 2/2] hda:
> thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED control". This means
> that "[PATCH 4/4] hda: thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED
> control" can only work with applied "[PATCH 1/4] hid-lenovo: Add support
> for X1 Tablet cover special keys" and "[PATCH v2 2/2] hda:
> thinkpad_helper: Add support for hid-lenovo LED control".
Ah, okay, I wasn't aware of the other patchset. These two probably should
be merged together. Is the other 2-patch set merged in any tree already?
Where has it been submitted to?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
