On Wed, Nov 25 2015, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> spin_lock_irqsave(&hdev->debug_list_lock, flags); >> list_for_each_entry(list, &hdev->debug_list, node) { >> - for (i = 0; i < strlen(buf); i++) >> + for (i = 0; buf[i]; i++) >> list->hid_debug_buf[(list->tail + i) % HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE] = >> buf[i]; >> list->tail = (list->tail + i) % HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE; > > trivia: > > The code might look nicer if (list->tail + i) % HID_DEBUG_BUFSIZE > was stored into a temporary. Maybe. > Maybe use an if >= BUFSIZE to avoid a % Nah, that would likely be worse; both a cmov and a conditional jump are probably more expensive than a simple '& 0x1ff' which the % should compile to (provided the expression is unsigned). Rasmus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html