Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt: add cap11xx LED documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:24:42AM -0700, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:23:57AM -0700, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Jacek Anaszewski
> >> <j.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On 06/22/2015 07:59 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:58:16PM -0700, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> ---
> >> >>>   .../devicetree/bindings/input/cap11xx.txt          | 25
> >> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >>>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/cap11xx.txt
> >> >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/cap11xx.txt
> >> >>> index 7d0a300..09cdc43 100644
> >> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/cap11xx.txt
> >> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/cap11xx.txt
> >> >>> @@ -38,6 +38,11 @@ Optional properties:
> >> >>>                                 defaults. The array must have exactly six
> >> >>>                                 entries.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> +       linux,led-brightness:   Defines the ON brightness when the
> >> >>> optional LED
> >> >>> +                               functionality is used. Valid values are
> >> >>> 1-15.
> >> >>> +                               By default a value of 15 is set.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Please mention the device does not allow controlling brightness of leds
> >> >> individually and that is why this property is at device level, not
> >> >> individual led level.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I've just noticed that we have drivers/leds/leds-netxbig.c driver, which
> >> > also doesn't allow controlling the LEDs on extension board individually,
> >> > but it still does allow changing their brightness. I am leaning towards
> >> > allowing this also for this driver and adding similar comment in the
> >> > source code like at the line 218 of the aforementioned driver.
> >> > As a result this property wouldn't be required.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Ok that should be pretty simple to do. But seems kind weird to have
> >> each led channel to be changing the brightness of all.  Wouldn't the
> >> brightness sysfs entries of the other led channels be showing
> >> incorrect values?
> >
> > I agree, this is kind of weird. Maybe we should have a device-specific
> > attribute (on the platform device level) that allows controlling overall
> > brightness, but I think LEDs should be just on/off with max brightness
> > of 1. Userspace should not have to be aware about the fact that on that
> > particular device LEDs are not completely independent as far as their
> > brightness goes.
> 
> So should I drop the devicetree part of the patch in v6?

I think so. Let's have the device come up with LEDs brightness at default
value and then users can adjust it as they need via sysfs.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux